Which is an accurate comparison of the development of scribal cultures in both mesopotamia and egypt?

Recommended textbook solutions

Which is an accurate comparison of the development of scribal cultures in both mesopotamia and egypt?

America's History for the AP Course

9th EditionEric Hinderaker, James A. Henretta, Rebecca Edwards, Robert O. Self

961 solutions

Which is an accurate comparison of the development of scribal cultures in both mesopotamia and egypt?

Ways of the World: A Global History

3rd EditionRobert W. Strayer

232 solutions

Which is an accurate comparison of the development of scribal cultures in both mesopotamia and egypt?

America's History for the AP Course

8th EditionEric Hinderaker, James A. Henretta, Rebecca Edwards, Robert O. Self

470 solutions

Which is an accurate comparison of the development of scribal cultures in both mesopotamia and egypt?

America's History for the AP Course

8th EditionEric Hinderaker, James A. Henretta, Rebecca Edwards, Robert O. Self

470 solutions

Chapter 2Rivers, Cities, and First States 3500–2000BCE23B.Pyramids were primarily tombs for the semi-divine pharaoh, while ziggurats were temples.C.Both were created to project the might and grandeur of the territory’s secular ruler.D.The ziggurat of Marduk was larger than the Great Pyramid.ANS: BDIF: ModerateREF: p. 59MSC: AnalyzingTOP: IIOBJ: 219.How did priests monopolize communication with spiritual powers and the people in ancient Egypt?DIF: Moderate

Get answer to your question and much more

REF: p. 60MSC: UnderstandingTOP: IIOBJ: 220.Which is an accurate comparison about the development of scribal cultures in both Mesopotamia and Egypt?A.Literacy immediately became important for all members of society.B.Scribes at first had little concern with trade and commerce.C.Scribes’ status was increased by the small number of people who were literate.D.Scribes were usually members of lower artisan classes.ANS: CDIF: Moderate

REF: p. 61MSC: ApplyingTOP: IIOBJ: 2

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Log in through your institution

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $20.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

journal article

Literacy and Ancient Egyptian Society

Man

New Series, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Sep., 1983)

, pp. 572-599 (28 pages)

Published By: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland

https://doi.org/10.2307/2801598

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2801598

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Purchase article

$20.00 - Download now and later

Abstract

From its first occurrence around 3000 B.C., writing was integral to the self-definition of Egyptian culture, especially in terms of display where it was part of a system of pictorial representation. By 2600 continuous texts were produced and any linguistic matter could be written; new genres of text appeared in stages, literary texts in the Middle Kingdom and some additional types in the New Kingdom. Very few people were literate, all of them officials of state; schooling was limited. The main script types, hieroglyphic, hieratic and demotic, have different, complementary functions. The entire system survived into late Roman times alongside the more widespread Greeck. Writing can be related to textual elaboration, to the sense of the past, magic and law, and perhaps to social change and stability but not as an overriding explanatory factor. Thus writing cannot explain the failure of radical change in Egypt or its success in Greece. The potential of writing is realised in stages over millennia.

Publisher Information

The Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (RAI) is the world's longest-established scholarly association dedicated to the furtherance of anthropology (the study of humankind) in its broadest and most inclusive sense. The Institute is a non-profit-making registered charity and is entirely independent, with a Director and a small staff accountable to the Council, which in turn is elected annually from the Fellowship. It has a Royal Patron in the person of HRH The Duke of Gloucester KG, GCVO.

What is an accurate comparison between ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia?

Similarities between Egypt and Mesopotamia include the fact that they were early societies located in the Near East, developed writing systems, were located near major rivers, and had hierarchical social structures, as well as polytheistic religions.

What most contributed to the development of Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations?

What material was used in the construction of ziggurats? writing. What most contributed to the development of Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations? temples.

What was a major difference between Mesopotamia and Egypt quizlet?

Mesopotamia was harsher and the Nile River flooded two times a year, they mainly had desert land and built with mud from water in canals. Egypt was easier because the Nile Vally had every resource they needed.

In what ways were Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations shaped by their interactions with near and distant neighbors?

In what ways were Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations shaped by their interactions with near and distant neighbors? The two civilizations were able to trade goods. The interactions brought along the Hittites and the Hyksos, who invaded the lands. They brought new things with them, both positive and negative.